search

Abigail Tere-Apisah vs Amanda Rodgers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tere-Apisah vs Rodgers analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Abigail Tere-Apisah vs Amanda Rodgers Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Tere-Apisah 1 - 0 Rodgers

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tere-Apisah has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rodgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tere-Apisah, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rodgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Tere-Apisah has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Tere-Apisah has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rodgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Tere-Apisah has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tere-Apisah winning 1 times and Rodgers being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tere-Apisah winning 2 and Rodgers winning 0. The last match between Tere-Apisah and Rodgers was at the Bethany Beach, 08-06-2017, Second, Clay with Abigail Tere-Apisah getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Tere-Apisah and Rodgers have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tere-Apisah winning 0 times and Rodgers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tere-Apisah winning 0, and Rodgers 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tere-Apisah has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rodgers has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tere-Apisah has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Tere-Apisah has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Abigail Tere-Apisah

1

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

Ret.

Rank

276

High

31

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

491

High

31

Age

Plays

Amanda Rodgers

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L W W W L W W L

Form

L L L W W L L W L L

60% (101-66)

Career Total W/L

49% (124-130)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Abigail Tere-Apisah vs Amanda Rodgers For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tere-Apisah VS Rodgers

Tere-Apisah VS Rodgers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Abigail Tere-Apisah Amanda Rodgers
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 4
Aces (Total) 0 1
DFs (Total) 6 6
Avg Match Time 1:13:0 1:13:0
1st Serve % 71% (34/48) 57% (28/49)
1st Serve Win% 65% (22/34) 46% (13/28)
2nd Serve Win% 50% (7/14) 33% (7/21)
BPs Won% (Total) 86% (6/7) 50% (2/4)
Return Points W% 59% (29/49) 40% (19/48)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Tere-Apisah VS Rodgers H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 6-3
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Amanda Rodgers
71% ( 34 of 48)
1st Serve %
57% ( 28 of 49)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
65% ( 22 of 34)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
50% ( 7 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 7 of 21)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
40% ( 19 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 29 of 49)
58
Total Points Won
39

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Abigail Tere-Apisah Amanda Rodgers
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Abigail Tere-Apisah Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Irina Ramialison
Player
Abigail Tere-Apisah
56% ( 38 of 68)
1st Serve %
76% ( 45 of 59)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
61% ( 23 of 38)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 22 of 45)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 7 of 14)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
41% ( 28 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 30 of 59)
70
Total Points Won
57
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Arina Rodionova
81% ( 47 of 58)
1st Serve %
69% ( 34 of 49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
53% ( 25 of 47)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
43% ( 25 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 29 of 49)
62
Total Points Won
45
W
6-4 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
81% ( 56 of 69)
1st Serve %
72% ( 41 of 57)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 19 of 41)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 4 of 16)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
42% ( 29 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 34 of 57)
74
Total Points Won
52
W
6-1 7-6(5) H2H
SF
cross
Destanee Aiava
Player
Abigail Tere-Apisah
61% ( 40 of 66)
1st Serve %
66% ( 38 of 58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
70% ( 28 of 40)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
36% ( 24 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 27 of 58)
69
Total Points Won
55
L
6-3 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Sakura Hosogi
70% ( 75 of 107)
1st Serve %
72% ( 62 of 86)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56% ( 42 of 75)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 26 of 62)
34% ( 11 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
69% ( 9 of 13)
Break Points Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
50% ( 54 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 49 of 86)
102
Total Points Won
91
W
6-1 3-6 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Naiktha Bains
70% ( 28 of 40)
1st Serve %
56% ( 30 of 54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
68% ( 19 of 28)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
38% ( 15 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 31 of 54)
56
Total Points Won
38
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Marianna Zakarlyuk
69% ( 31 of 45)
1st Serve %
55% ( 38 of 69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
71% ( 22 of 31)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 8 of 31)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
33% ( 15 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 38 of 69)
68
Total Points Won
46
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Abigail Tere-Apisah
68% ( 50 of 73)
1st Serve %
62% ( 48 of 77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64% ( 32 of 50)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 25 of 48)
39% ( 9 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
80% ( 8 of 10)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
44% ( 32 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 41 of 77)
82
Total Points Won
68
L
4-6 6-1 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Abigail Tere-Apisah
Player
Sohyun Park
62% ( 49 of 79)
1st Serve %
56% ( 45 of 80)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59% ( 29 of 49)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 20 of 45)
43% ( 13 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 16 of 35)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
47% ( 37 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 44 of 80)
86
Total Points Won
73
W
7-6(6) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Xinyu Wang
Player
Abigail Tere-Apisah
51% ( 39 of 76)
1st Serve %
60% ( 47 of 78)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 24 of 47)
46% ( 17 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 11 of 31)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
45% ( 34 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 43 of 78)
85
Total Points Won
69
L
7-6(2) 6-3 H2H

Amanda Rodgers Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73% ( 38 of 52)
1st Serve %
54% ( 27 of 50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71% ( 27 of 38)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 16 of 27)
64% ( 9 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 9 of 23)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
31% ( 16 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 25 of 50)
61
Total Points Won
41
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66% ( 38 of 58)
1st Serve %
67% ( 52 of 78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63% ( 24 of 38)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
41% ( 24 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 43 of 78)
77
Total Points Won
59
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52% ( 45 of 86)
1st Serve %
63% ( 45 of 72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64% ( 29 of 45)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 30 of 45)
59% ( 24 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
38% ( 33 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 27 of 72)
80
Total Points Won
78
L
7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
Q2
W
6-0 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 3-6 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Amanda Rodgers
53% ( 32 of 60)
1st Serve %
47% ( 27 of 57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69% ( 22 of 32)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 17 of 27)
54% ( 15 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 11 of 30)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
38% ( 23 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 29 of 57)
66
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 7-5 H2H
Q1
L
6-3 3-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Lauren Davis
Player
Amanda Rodgers
50% ( 36 of 72)
1st Serve %
57% ( 43 of 75)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
61% ( 22 of 36)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
50% ( 18 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 10 of 32)
50% ( 7 of 14)
Break Points Won
63% ( 5 of 8)
44% ( 32 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 40 of 75)
80
Total Points Won
67
L
6-4 2-6 6-0 H2H

Tere-Apisah Vs Rodgers Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Tere-Apisah are available here and Rodgers photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions